Monitored Anesthesia Care in Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomas and Adenomyosis

Background: Patients undergoing an interventional radiology procedure report some degree of anxiety. Therefore, procedure-related anxiety needs to be managed. The aim of our study was to investigate patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for uterine artery embolization (UAE)-related procedural anxiety in symptomatic uterine fibroids or adenomyosis. Method(s): Between May 2021 and June 2022, 36 patients with symptomatic fibroids or adenomyosis underwent UAE with MAC. Follow-up evaluations consisted of clinical symptoms, degree of satisfaction with MAC in UAE, and complications. Result(s): MAC in UAE was successfully performed in all patients. UAE significantly reduced patients' complaints such as bleeding and pain: the scores for bleeding and pain were significantly reduced after 3 months of UAE compared with those before UAE, indicating the effectiveness of UAE. The mean score of satisfaction with MAC in UAE was 4.3 points, meaning that 94.4% of women were satisfied or very satisfied. No major complications were observed. Conclusion(s): MAC in UAE for symptomatic uterine fibroids or adenomyosis can be emotionally effective and safe for patients who are anxious about the procedure.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).

The construction of patient quality management model in oral post anesthesia care unit in China: a grounded theory approach.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, people have paid more and more attention to the quality of physical and mental health recovery after oral surgery anesthesia. As a remarkable feature of patient quality management, it can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative complications and pain in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). However, the patient management model in oral PACU remains unknown, especially in China. The purpose of this study is to explore the management elements of patient quality management in the oral PACU and to construct the management model. METHODS: Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory method was used to explore the experiences of three anesthesiologists, six anesthesia nurses and three administrators working in oral PACU. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted using face-to-face in a tertiary stomatological hospital from March to June, 2022. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed according to QSR NVivo 12.0 qualitative analysis tool. RESULTS: Three themes and ten subthemes were identified through an active analysis process, including three of the core team members: stomatological anesthesiologists, stomatological anesthesia nurses and administrators, three of the main functions: education and training, patient care and quality control and four of the team operation processes: analysis, plan, do, check. CONCLUSION: The patient quality management model of the oral PACU is helpful for the professional identity and career development of stomatological anesthesia staff in China, which can accelerate the professional development of oral anesthesia nursing quality. According to the model, the patient's pain and fear will decrease, meanwhile, safety and comfort will increase. It can make contributions to the theoretical research and clinical practice in the future.

Life-threatening hypotension in the immediate postoperative period of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: a report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is one of the most frequent surgeries in the world. It is a very safe procedure mostly performed under topical anesthesia in outpatients centers. Due to the growing lack of anesthesiologists, cataract surgeries are more frequently performed without an anesthesiologist present in the operating room. Although extremely rare, life-threatening complications may occur. CASES PRESENTATION: We report two cases of cataract surgery complicated by severe hypotension that required emergency resuscitation in the immediate postoperative period and hospitalization in intensive care unit. Anaphylactic shock was confirmed in the first case and suspected in the second. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Even though cataract surgery is a very safe procedure, it is essential to ensure the presence of an anesthesiologist to manage potential, though extremely rare, life-threatening complications such as anaphylactic reactions.

Quality Assurance in Pre-Endoscopic Evaluation

Endoscopy is an essential component of gastroenterology, allowing for the diagnosis and management of a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Although most endoscopies are considered to be low risk procedures, several factors including the sedation, patient, and procedure play a role in determining overall risk. Patient assessment prior to endoscopy is essential to risk-stratification and provides an opportunity to review comorbidities, adjust medications if necessary, and identify an optimal sedation plan. Several best practice recommendations and guidelines have been developed to ensure that safe, high-quality endoscopies are performed to minimize risks and optimize outcomes. The purpose of this review is to highlight best practices related to pre-endoscopic evaluation and, when available, review quality indicators.

Documenting urine output for pediatric urology patients in the post-anesthesia care unit: A quality improvement initiative.

INTRODUCTION: Close monitoring and documentation of urine output (UOP) after urologic surgery is a nursing standard of care in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). UOP is a critical piece of information for surgeons and anesthesiologists to provide safe quality patient care. The electronic medical record (EMR) is used to communicate this information between members of the care team. Initial review at our institution confirmed only 31.3% of children recovering in the PACU after urologic surgery had a numerical value for UOP documented in the EMR. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to improve compliance of UOP documentation in the EMR for pediatric urologic patients in the PACU from 31.3% to 80% by August 2021, using quality improvement methodology. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing urologic surgery with planned post-operative hospital admission were identified in the EMR by admission status and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. UOP documentation data during the patients' PACU stay was retrieved from the EMR. Traditional QI methods were used to develop a key driver diagram, identify barriers, and implement targeted interventions. Statistical process control charts tracked the outcome measure (percentage of patients with UOP documented in the PACU) and balancing measure (average PACU length of stay). RESULTS: The project began in July 2019, and four interventions started between July and October 2019. These interventions resulted in a centerline shift of our outcome measure, UOP documentation rate, from 31.3% to 76.2% (p < 0.001). Patient volumes were stable with the exception of March, April, and May 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic. An X-bar chart tracked PACU LOS, the balancing measure, in average minutes per patient without any trends. DISCUSSION: This quality improvement initiative sought to improve urine output (UOP) documentation for pediatric urologic patients during the immediate post-operative period. Targeted interventions leading to this improvement included educating nursing staff, establishing direct communication expectations for the surgical team, and improving the availability of UOP measurement tools. Limitations include reliance on education and behavioral change, only including urologic surgery patients, and our institution's robust focus on quality improvement work. CONCLUSIONS: This performance improvement initiative successfully increased the rate of UOP documentation by PACU nurses for pediatric urology patients through a combination of interventions. The next phase is to expand these interventions throughout the hospital to improve UOP documentation for all post-operative patients.

Neurosurgical Outcomes, Protocols, and Resource Management During Lockdown: Early Institutional Experience from One of the World's Largest COVID 19 Hotspots.

BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic surpasses 1 year, it is prudent to reflect on the challenges faced and the management strategies employed to tackle this overwhelming health care crisis. We undertook this study to validate our institutional protocols, which were formulated to cater to the change in volume and pattern of neurosurgical cases during the raging pandemic. METHODS: All admitted patients scheduled to undergo major neurosurgical intervention during the lockdown period (15 March 2020 to 15 September 2020) were included in the study. The data involving surgery outcomes, disease pattern, anesthesia techniques, patient demographics, as well as COVID-19 status, were analyzed and compared with similar retrospective data of neurosurgical patients operated during the same time period in the previous year (15 March 2019 to 15 September 2019). RESULTS: Barring significant increase in surgery for stroke (P = 0.008) and hydrocephalus (P <0.001), the overall case load of neurosurgery during the study period in 2020 was 42.75% of that in 2019 (P < 0.001), attributable to a significant reduction in elective spine surgeries (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in the overall incidence of emergency and essential surgeries undertaken during the 2 time periods (P = 0.482). There was an increased incidence in the use of monitored anesthesia care techniques during emergency and essential neurosurgical procedures by the anesthesia team in 2020 (P < 0.001). COVID-19 patients had overall poor outcomes (P = 0.003), with significant increase in mortality among those subjected to general anesthesia vis-a-vis monitored anesthesia care (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant decrease in neurosurgical workload during the COVID-19 lockdown period in 2020, the volume of emergency and essential surgeries did not change much compared with the previous year. Surgery in COVID-19 patients is best avoided, unless critical, as the outcome in these patients is not favorable. The employment of monitored anesthesia care techniques like awake craniotomy and regional anesthesia facilitate a better outcome in the ongoing COVID-19 era.

Fetal Surgery in the Era of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Single-Institution Review.

OBJECTIVE: To cope with the changing health care services in the era of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We share the institutional framework for the management of anomalous fetuses requiring fetal intervention at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. To assess the success of our program during this time, we compare intraoperative outcomes of fetal interventions performed during the pandemic with the previous year. PATIENTS: We implemented our testing protocol on patients undergoing fetal intervention at our institution between March 1, and May 15, 2020, and we compared it with same period a year before. A total of 17 pregnant patients with anomalous fetuses who met criteria for fetal intervention were included: 8 from 2019 and 9 from 2020. METHODS: Our testing protocol was designed based on our institutional perinatal guidelines, surgical requirements from the infection prevention and control (IPAC) committee, and input from our fetal surgery team, with focus on urgency of procedure and maternal SARS-CoV-2 screening status. We compared the indications, types of procedures, maternal age, gestational age at procedure, type of anesthesia used, and duration of procedure for cases performed at our institution between March 1, 2020, and May 15, 2020, and for the same period in 2019. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences among the number of cases, indications, types of procedures, maternal age, gestational age, types of anesthesia, and duration of procedures (P values were all >.05) between the pre-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2019 and the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of new institutional protocols during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with appropriate screening and case selection, allows provision of necessary fetal intervention with maximal benefit to mother, fetus, and health care provider.